Publish with Us

Analyses– The Network for Strategic Analysis

What is an ‘Analysis’?

An ‘Analysis’ is an informed short essay that addresses a particular policy question or problem. It should have a clear argument, provides at most two paragraphs of context, and makes an impactful statement, if not a provocation, that is intended (a) to stimulate thinking on an issue among members of the Canadian national security community; (b) to raise awareness of an underappreciated aspect of that issue; and/or (c) to convey to an informed audience a particular policy recommendation. The ‘Analysis’ should be informed by scholarly or analytical expertise, but it must be free of jargon.

Do note that ‘Analyses’ are reviewed in a double-blind manner.

What can an ‘Analysis’ be about?

An ‘Analysis’ can be about any matter of relevance to international security as well as Canadian defence and foreign policy. However, owing to its brevity, the ‘Analysis’ should be as specific and concrete as possible. For example, rather than consider the impact of the new defence policy update, an ‘Analysis’ should focus on its impact on NORAD—that is, a particular program, international arrangement, and so forth.

Format

• Use the NSA template
• Hyperlinked references: no footnotes or author-date references, no bibliography or list of references

Structure

‘Analysis’ is open-ended in structure, but the author(s) should convey the basic argument (or provocation) no later than three paragraphs into the essay. Headings are useful for signposting the text but should be specific enough to signal to readers the content of the essay, if not parts of the argument.

Writing Style

• Use short sentences. Avoid flaunting your knowledge. Get to the point.
• Avoid academic jargon. Use a more direct style, which can be understood by non-specialists.
• Make sure that the facts, ideas and arguments clearly match the conclusions and, if any, recommendations of the ‘Analysis’.

Strategic Reports – The Network for Strategic Analysis

What is a policy report?

Strategic reports are topical and innovative analyzes on topics of interest and concern to security policy makers, analysts, scholars, and the general public. By exploring a topic in more detail than a traditional policy brief, strategic reports use evidence-based research and analysis that provide readers with critical information about the context and key characteristics of a topic, issue, or situation, as well as recommendations focused on Canada and its policies.

In the field of security and defence, the range of potential topics is wide, and authors are encouraged to use Strategic reports to inform policy decisions and public debate on any topics they feel merit further consideration – not just those who have dominated recent discourse – and to mobilize conventional or unconventional perspectives on security.

What are the objectives of a strategic report?

Strategic reports should meet the following objectives:

• Present evidence-based research, information and analysis on topics of interest in order to amplify the voice of experts and provide a more solid basis for decision-making;
• Highlight approaches and areas of interest to the security community that have been under-researched and require further attention;
• Promote innovation and encourage a multidisciplinary and synergistic approach to research and analysis;
• Present clear and timely policy recommendations and considerations in order to productively contribute to discussion, debate, and decision-making.

The Strategic reports for the Network for Strategic Analysis should fit into one or more of the strategic challenges that guide the NSA:

• The evolving role of great powers in a shifting world order
• Multilateral cooperation in international security
• The future of defence capacity building for global partners

Format

• Use the NSA template
• Length: 8 pages maximum
• The strategic report should include a summary of approximately 150 words
• Hyperlinked references: no footnotes or author-date references, no bibliography or list of references.

Structure

Strategic reports are divided into three parts:

1. Introduction

• • Describe the topic, riddle or problem associated with it and the author’s argument.

2. Development

• • Provide general and contextual information on the subject.
  • Provide an analysis of the information and outline the potential implications, noting the existing debates and different points of view
  • Use headings and subheadings to structure the brief and guide the reader in your analysis.

3. Policy considerations and recommendations

• • Proceed logically to coherent, Canada-centered policy recommendations or considerations.

Considerations for the author(s)

• The policy report must provide a clear argument on an easily identifiable subject among the three strategic challenges of the RAS.
• Recommendations are essential. The report is expected to provide Canada-focused policy recommendations that build on the above analysis and are supported by a clear rationale and expected outcomes.
• The report should be based on evidence-based research and analysis, drawing on subject expertise to provide a foundation for recommendations.
• The report can contribute to an existing debate or open a new topic for discussion.

Writing style

• Make sure that the purpose of the topic covered in the report is clear: the reader should know why this topic is important and what its implications are.
• A strategic report is longer than a policy brief. This extra space should be used to provide more in-depth information and analysis.
• Avoid academic jargon. Use a more direct style, which can be understood by non-specialists.
• Make sure that the facts, ideas, and arguments clearly match the conclusions and recommendations of the strategic report
• Keep different audiences in mind. Although the information, analysis and policy recommendations should be of particular interest to the Government of Canada and certain departments, notably DND/CAF, the strategic report should also be useful to other organizations, institutions, and the general public.

Spotlights – The Network for Strategic Analysis

Spotlights are Short essays that serve to convey recently published academic monographs and university press books in security studies, Canadian foreign and defence policy, international relations, security studies, and strategic studies.

Spotlights are akin to a book review but should not be confused for one since they offer neither ‘academic take downs’ or ‘praise singing’. Rather, spotlights summarize the main argument of the key work in question, explain the significance of its findings to practitioners and informed audiences interested in national security, apply the theoretical framework of the body to illuminate recent or current events, and/or outline the implications for Canadian foreign and defence policy. Spotlights serve to translate, as well as to highlight, the cutting edge in academic research to broader audiences who may not be familiar with the scholarship or do not have the time to consume it in full.

Format

• Use the NSA template
• Length: 2000 words maximum
• Hyperlinked references: no footnotes or author-date references, no bibliography or list of references

Structure

‘Spotlights’ are open-ended in structure, but the author(s) should convey the basic argument less than two paragraphs into the essay. Headings are useful for signposting the text but should be specific enough to signal to readers the content of the essay, if not parts of the argument.

Writing Style

Use short sentences. Avoid flaunting your knowledge. Get to the point.

Avoid academic jargon. Use a more direct style, which can be understood by non-specialists.

Be faithful to the original argument. Represent it well without sensationalizing it for effect or ignoring the caveats that come with it. Many authors have to make bold claims up front but then attach important qualifications to them.

Policy Forums – The Network for Strategic Analysis

Policy Forums aim to stimulate debate by presenting a wide range of expert opinion on a topic of national security significance to Canada. Each edition will comprise several very short essays that are no longer than 300 words each. Contributions should be free of jargon as much as possible and involve staking a clear position on the framing question. Hyperlinks to substantiate any key claims are desirable but they are not obligatory. Contributors will be writing blindly without seeing the other arguments. They will be reviewed only by the editorial team at RAS.